LST Auto delegates
Guide to auto-delegates in stGOV
When users stake governance tokens with the LST, they can actively delegate their voting power to specific delegates. However, in situations where tokens are held in DeFi protocols, cold storage, or centralized exchanges, direct delegation becomes challenging. This is where auto-delegates come in.
Auto-delegates provide a backup mechanism for governance participation when stGOV tokens are not actively delegated by their holders. They ensure that governance power doesn't become "stranded" and maintains active participation in the protocol's governance.
Why Auto-Delegates Matter
Auto-delegates solve several critical problems:
Preventing Governance Power Loss: Without auto-delegates, voting power from stGOV tokens held in DeFi or exchanges would be effectively lost to governance.
Maintaining Quorum: Auto-delegates help ensure sufficient voting participation to reach quorum for important proposals.
Protecting Against Capture: A well-designed auto-delegate strategy prevents governance capture when a large portion of tokens are inactive.
Reflecting Community Consensus: Auto-delegates can be configured to vote according to established community values and preferences.
Available Auto-Delegate Options
No Auto-Delegate (Burn Address)
The simplest approach is to not use an auto-delegate at all, effectively sending the voting power to a "burn" address.
Characteristics:
Voting power from non-delegated tokens is completely removed from governance
Simplest implementation with no additional code or maintenance
Reduces total active voting power, potentially making quorum easier to achieve
May lead to governance power concentration among active delegators
Best for:
Protocols prioritizing active participation only
Situations where you want to penalize inactive token holders
Communities with high active governance participation already
Overwhelming Support Auto-Delegate
Characteristics:
Only votes when proposals have reached a configurable threshold of support
Helps high-consensus proposals cross the finish line
Won't vote on controversial proposals, i.e. those with mixed support.
Key Parameters:
subQuorumBips
: The percentage of the quorum that proposals must have already achieved from FOR votessupportThreshold
: The required ratio of FOR votes to (FOR + AGAINST) votesvotingWindow
: The timeframe before a proposal's deadline when the auto-delegate can vote
Best for:
Governance systems seeking to maintain quorum while respecting community consensus
Protocols wanting to avoid governance deadlock on broadly supported proposals
Communities with lower active participation rates
Build a Custom Auto-Delegate
Protocols can create custom auto-delegates tailored to their specific governance needs and philosophy.
Potential Custom Implementations:
Delegate Council Auto-Delegate: Follows voting decisions made by a trusted council or experts
Meta-Governance Auto-Delegate: Votes based on a meta-governance system
Last updated
Was this helpful?